Tantangan & Peluang Eksistensi Kepemimpinan Ondoafi dalam bingkai Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Kampung Nafri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31957/jeb.v13i1.4701Keywords:
Ondoafi, village governance, legal pluralism, traditional leadership, PapuaAbstract
This study aims to examine the challenges and opportunities for the existence of Ondoafi traditional leadership in the context of governance in Kampung Nafri, Jayapura City, which is experiencing the dynamics of pluralism between traditional power and modern government structures. The main focus is on how Ondoafi leadership maintains its legitimacy and role amid modernization, national regulations, and changes in local social values. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach using case study methodology, deemed most relevant for understanding complex social phenomena. Data collection techniques include field observations, in-depth interviews with key informants, and documentary analysis. Data analysis is conducted using an inductive-thematic approach with an interactive methodology emphasizing reflective interpretation of the social and historical context. The results of the study show that the existence of Ondoafi faces structural and cultural challenges, such as weak regeneration, the absence of formal regulations, and the marginalization of the role of customs in village development planning. However, great opportunities are also opening up through constitutional recognition of indigenous peoples, support for Papua's special autonomy, and increasing public awareness of the importance of preserving traditional values. Synergy between traditional and formal leadership can be achieved through collaborative governance, the revitalization of traditional institutions, and the participation of Ondoafi in the formulation of village policies. This study recommends an inclusive and responsive village governance model that addresses the social and cultural dynamics of Papua.
Downloads
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Benda-Beckmann, F. von. (2002). Who’s afraid of legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 34(47), 37–82.
Dove, M. R. (2006). "Indigenous People and Environmental Politics." Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123235
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford University Press.
Golub, S. (2003). Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Working Paper No. 41.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism?. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Haryanto, A. (2012). Revitalisasi Budaya Lokal dalam Pemerintahan Desa. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 16(1), 45–56.
Kartono, K. (1994). Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan: Apakah Kepemimpinan Abnormal Itu? Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Revised ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
Suparlan, P. (2008). Kepemimpinan Adat dalam Sistem Sosial Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
UNDP. (1997). Governance for Sustainable Human Development. United Nations Development Programme.
Uphoff, N. (1992). Learning from Gal Oya: Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. Cornell University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.