Pemberdayaan Pengusaha Orang Asli Papua (OAP) dalam Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Jayapura

Authors

  • Alberto Freed Itaar Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih, Indonesia
  • Akbar Silo Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih , Indonesia
  • Vince Tebay Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih , Indonesia
  • Hans Z Kaiwai Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih , Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31957/jeb.v13i2.4928

Keywords:

Empowerment, Indigenous Papuans, Public Policy, Special Autonomy, Local Entrepreneurship

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of empowering Indigenous Papuan Entrepreneurs (OAP) within the Jayapura City Government’s policy framework during Papua’s Special Autonomy (Otsus) Phase II, focusing on barriers, opportunities, and strategies to strengthen business independence. A qualitative descriptive method with a case study approach was applied, using in-depth interviews, observations, and policy document analysis. The findings reveal that affirmative policy implementation is hindered by weak managerial capacity, low digital literacy, traditional business institutions, and identity manipulation practices by non-OAP entrepreneurs, which distort empowerment goals and perpetuate dependency. Nevertheless, strategic opportunities remain through special regulatory support, the SIKaP OAP digital application, and a collaborative penta-helix model involving government, private sector, academia, and local communities. The study concludes that affirmative policy reform is needed to be more contextual, participatory, and capacity-based, with recommendations to strengthen digital literacy, ensure fair access to capital, reinforce OAP institutions, and implement transparent monitoring and evaluation, thereby enabling OAP’s economic independence and positioning them as key actors in Jayapura’s economic development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Akbar Silo, Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih

Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih

Vince Tebay, Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih

Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih`

Hans Z Kaiwai, Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih

Program Doktor Ilmu Sosial Program Pascasarjana Universitas Cenderawasih

References

Bhave, M. P. (1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90031-0

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dove, M. R. (1996). So far from power, so near to the forest: A structural analysis of gain and blame in tropical forest development. Development and Change, 27(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1996.tb00577.x

Edwards, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Gausset, Q., Kenrick, J., & Gibb, R. (2011). Indigeneity and autochthony: A global perspective. London: Routledge.

Grindle, M. S. (2017). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 35, O199–O221. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12294

Hill, C. W., & Shrader, R. C. (1998). Strategic management theory: An integrated approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Mansnembra, C. (2010, August 27). Inisiasi terobosan baru untuk penguatan pengusaha asli Papua [Seminar presentation]. Jayapura.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nugroho, Y. (2019). E-government dan transformasi pelayanan publik di Indonesia. Jakarta: LIPI Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Sahlins, M. (1999). Two or three things that I know about culture. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(3), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661275

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sopian, A. (2025). Implementasi Undang-Undang Desa dalam perspektif koordinasi antarsektor. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 12(1), 45–60.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Warmadewanthi, I. (2018). Institutional barriers to local entrepreneurship in Papua. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 10(4), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-06-2017-0046

Widjojo, M. S. (2010). Papua road map: Negotiating the past, improving the present and securing the future. Jakarta: LIPI Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-31

How to Cite

Itaar, A. F., Silo, A., Tebay, V., & Kaiwai, H. Z. (2025). Pemberdayaan Pengusaha Orang Asli Papua (OAP) dalam Kebijakan Pemerintah Kota Jayapura. JURNAL EKOLOGI BIROKRASI, 13(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.31957/jeb.v13i2.4928

Citation Check