Analisis Sektor Unggulan dan Perubahan Struktur Ekonomi di Kabupaten Mimika Tahun 2017-2021

Authors

  • Selpi Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Mesak Iek Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Hans Z. Kaiwai Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56076/jkesp.v10i1.5395

Abstract

This research aims to identify leading sectors and changes in the economic structure without mining in Mimika Regency in 2017–2021. The data used in this research is secondary data on Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) according to business fields on the basis of constant prices in 2010, with data years 2017–2021. The analysis tools used are Location Quotient, Shift Share Analysis, and Klassen Typology. The results of the location quotient analysis without mining found that there are 8 basic (leading) sectors, namely: 1) the electricity and gas procurement sector; 2) the wholesale and retail trade sector; 3) the car and motorcycle repair sector; 4) the transportation and warehousing sector; 5) the accommodation and food and drink provision sector; 6) the information and communication sector; 6) the financial services and insurance sector; 7) the real estate sector; and 8) the corporate services sector. Furthermore, the results of the shift share analysis show that, in aggregate, there have been structural changes in the economic sector in Mimika Regency during 2017–2021, where the entire economic sector is classified as progressive and growing faster than the same sector in Papua Province. Meanwhile, according to the Klassen Typology analysis, the economic sector in Mimika Regency, which is classified as a developed sector and is growing rapidly, consists of 8 sectors, including: 1) the electricity and gas procurement sector; 2) the wholesale and retail trade sector; 3) car and motorcycle repair; 4) the transportation and warehousing sector; 5) the accommodation and food and drink provision sector; 6) the information and communication sector; 6) the financial services and insurance sector; 7) the real estate sector; and 8) the corporate services sector. The regional government needs to continue to encourage the process of structural change in the economic sector in Mimika Regency so that sectors that have the potential to develop can grow more quickly. The emergence of new sectors is a good thing for the regional economy. In the future, it is necessary to carry out analysis with valid data in order to find changes in the regional economic structure appropriately so that it can support a more optimal regional economy.

Keywords: Leading sectors and changes in economic structure without mining

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adisasmita Rahardjo (2005 ). Dasar-Dasar Ekonomi Wilayah. Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta.

Arsyad. Lincolin. 2005. Pengantar Perencanaan Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah. Edisi kedua. Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN. Yogyakarta

........................... 2010. Ekonomi Pembangunan. Edisi keempat. Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Budiono.1985. Teori Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Edisi Pertama. BPFE. Yogyakarta.

Direktorat jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan data .Data series. APBD tahun 2007- 2011. www.djpk.depkeu.go.id

Glasson. Jhon. 1990. Pengantar Perencanaan Regional. terjemahan Paul Sitohang. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta

Hoover. EM. 1977 . Pengantar Ekonomi Regional . Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Indonesia. Jakarta

Irman dan Fachrizal Bachri. “Analisis Potensi Sektoral Kabupaten Lahat Provinsi Sumatera Selatan”. Dalam Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Vol. 2. No. 1. Hal. 77-103, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, 2003.

Kuncoro.Mudrajad.2003. Ekonomi Pembangunan Teori. Masalah dan Kebijakan. Edisi Pertama. UPP AMP YKPN. Yogyakarta.

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1957, Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions, London : Penguin Books

North, Douglass C. 1991. Institutions, Jornal of Economic Perspective, Vol % 91), PP.97-112

Rachbini. Didik J. 2001. Pembangunan Ekonomi & Sumber Daya Manusia. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Jakarta.

Richardson. Harry W. 2001. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Ekonomi Regional. Terjemahan Paul Sitohang. Edisi Revisi. Lembaga Penerbit FE UI. Jakarta.

Salvator. Dominick . 1996 . principles of Economics.second Edition.

Sjafrizal.1997. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Ketimpangan Regional Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat. Prisma LP3ES. No 3 Tahun XXVI :27-38

Sirojuzilam. 2008. Disparitas Ekonomi dan Perencanaan regional, ketimpangan Ekonomi Wilayah Barat dan Timur Propinsi Sumatera Utara, Pustaka Bangsa pers

Soetiono. Dedi NS. 2011. Ekonomi Pengembangan Wilayah. Lembaga penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta

Setiawan, I Made Darma, “Peranan Sektor Unggulan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah Jawa Timur, Bali, dan Nusa Tenggara Barat: Pendekatan Input-Output Multiregional”, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, 2005.

Tarigan. Robinson. 2007. Ekonomi Regional. Teori dan Aplikasi. PT. Bumi Aksara. Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta.

Todaro. Michael P. 2000. Pembangunan Ekonomi di Dunia Ketiga. Penerbit Erlangga. Edisi Ketujuh. Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Selpi, Iek, M., & Kaiwai, H. Z. (2026). Analisis Sektor Unggulan dan Perubahan Struktur Ekonomi di Kabupaten Mimika Tahun 2017-2021. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.56076/jkesp.v10i1.5395

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>