ANALISIS KUALITAS PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAERAH DI PROVINSI PAPUA

Authors

  • Yundy Hafizrianda Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Ida Ayu Purbariani Universitas Cenderawasih
  • Boy Pieter Nizu Kekry Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52062/keuda.v4i3.1094

Abstract

In general, the aim of this study is to measure and analyze the quality of regional financial management in the Papua Provincial Government in a structured and comprehensive manner. Where the measurement and analysis methods used include a model of fiscal independence, the effectiveness and efficiency of local government revenue, as well as expenditure ratio models. Based on the results of measurements with the local government budgeting management analysis tools founds that overall the quality of local government budgeting management of the Provincial Government of Papua is good. The indicators of the quality of local government budgeting management can be seen from the timeliness in preparing the APBD-Induk  and APBD-Perubahan, the efficiency and effectiveness of local government revenue, the ratio of PAD to local government revenue, absorption of Government Expenditure, the trend of SILPA, and BPK's opinion on LKPD. The quality of local government budgeting management by using the Timeliness Indicator in the preparation of the APBD-Induk and APBD-Perubahan looks varied and said to be of good quality, especially in 2015 and 2016, both the determination of APBD-Induk and APBD-Perubahan indicated on time. Furthermore, when analyzed in the trend of local government revenue, categorized quite well, where the level of efficiency and effectiveness is high, but its independence is still very low. In the composition of local government expenditure, capital expenditure tends to be always above employee expenditure, besides that the absorption capacity of local government expenditure is good because it averages close to 90% per year during the 2013-2015 period, so that the overall quality of local government budgeting management when observed from the performance of local government expenditure rated good. Next, in the SILPA APBD position, it tends to be always in a fluctuating positive value during 2013-2015, and categorized as good quality. Finally, based on the opinion of the BPK (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan) on the LKPD (Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah), throughout 2015-2018 the Papua Province always received the title of WTP (Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian), so from the development of this opinion indicated that the local government budgeting management of the Provincial Government of Papua is very good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhusain, A. S., et al. Kebijakan dan Strategi Peningkatan Pendapatan Asli Daerah dalam Pembangunan Nasional. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia,

BPKAD Provinsi Papua. 2018. Penerimaan Dan Pengalokasian

Dana Otonomi Khusus Papua Tahun 2002-2016. Badan Pengelola Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Pemerintah Provinsi Papua, Jayapura.

BPS Provinsi Papua. 2016. Papua Dalam Angka Tahun 2016. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua, Jayapura.

_______________________. 2015. Papua Dalam Angka Tahun 2015. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua, Jayapura.

________________________. 2014. Papua Dalam Angka Tahun 2014. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Papua, Jayapura.

Daryanto, A., dan Hafizrianda, Y. 2010. Metode Kuantitatif Untuk Perencanaan Pembangunan. IPB-Press, Bogor.

Deputi BPRDOD RI. 2012. Pembangunan Daerah Dalam Angka 2012. Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Regional dan Otonomi Daerah, Bappenas RI, Jakarta.

DJPK KEMENKEU RI. 2019. APBD dan Neraca Daerah. Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan Kementerian Keuangan RI, Jakarta.

Ekawarna, S.U., Sam, I., dan Rahayu, S. 2009. Pengukuran Kinerja Anggaran Pendapatan Dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Muaro Jambi. Jurnal Cakrawala Akuntansi, Jambi

Halim, A. 2012. Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah.Salemba Empat, Yogyakarta.

Mardiasmo. 2002. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. ANDI. Yogyakarta.

Musgrave, R. A., dan Musgrave, P.B. 1984. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. Fourth Edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

Nurhidayat. 2005. Otonomi Daerah Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pusat dan Daerah, UU RI No. 32 Tahun 2004 & UU RI No. 33 Tahun 2004. Penerbit Nuansa Aulia, Bandung.

SEKDA Provinsi Papua. 2013. Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Papua nomor 14 Tahun 2013 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Provinsi Papua Tahun 2013-2018. Seketaris Daerah Provinsi Papua, Jayapura.

SETNEG RI. 2001. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2001 Tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua. Seketariat Negara RI, Jakarta.

____________ . 2004. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Seketariat Negara RI, Jakarta.

____________. 2014. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Seketariat Negara RI, Jakarta.

____________. 2008. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Seketariat Negara RI, Jakarta.

Siyoto, S., dan Ali, S. 2015. Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Literasi Media, Yogyakarta.

Suparmoko. 1991. Keuangan Negara Dalam Teori dan Praktik, edisi empat, BPFE-UGM, Yogyakarta.

TP2K. 2017. Laporan Realisasi Fisik dan Keuangan Pelaksanaan APBD Provinsi Papua TA 2013-2016. Tim Pengendali Program dan Kegiatan Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Papua, Jayapura.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles