The Effectiveness of Indomalphi Trilateral Cooperation in Reducing Maritime Piracy by Abu Sayyaf Group in the Sulu-Sulawesi Sea
This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the maritime patrol regime (Indomalphi regime) in reducing piracy cases of the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) in the Sulu Sea and Sulawesi Sea involving Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Referring to the concept of regime effectiveness, it was found that the Indomalphi regime was proven effective in reducing the number of maritime cases in the Sulu and Sulawesi seas. The effectiveness of the regime is formed by a combination of four positive factors: (1) the regime is not classified as benign, indicating no inconsistencies, asymmetries, and cumulative splits in the formation of the Indomalphi regime; (2) the regime has a good problem-solving capacity because of epistemic community support that tightly integrated into the regime; (3) level of collaboration between the regime members is high, indicated by memberâ€™s compliance to the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the Indomalphiâ€™s patrols even though there is no sanctions mechanism; (4) the regime facing a political context which provides an advantage with indicated by smooth cooperation during the process of Indomalphi cooperation even the three countries have sovereign sentiments and maritime territorial conflicts.
KEYWORDSAbu Sayyaf Group; Indomalphi; Maritime Piracy; Regime Effectiveness; Sulu-Sulawesi Sea
Amri, A. A. (2014). Southeast Asiaâ€™s maritime piracy: Challenges, legal instruments and a way forward. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 6(3), 154â€“169. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2014.915492
Arifin, S., Ras., A. R., & Siswoyo, M. (2018). Pencegahan Aksi Kekerasan Maritim Oleh Kelompok Abu Sayyaf Di Laut Sulawesi â€“ Sulu Dalam Kerangka Keamanan Maritim (Studi Kasus Kapal Tunda Tb Brahma 12 â€“ Kapal Tongkang Bg Anand 12). Jurnal Keamanan Maritim, 4(2), 39â€“66.
Astriana, F., Arif, M., Fadhilla, A., Bastaman, H. H., & Wensatama, V. T. (2018). Joint Maritime Cooperation in the South China Sea: Lessons from the Indonesiaâ€“Malaysiaâ€“Philippines Trilateral Maritime Patrol (Indomalphi). Asean Briefs, 5(4), 1â€“8. https://www.habibiecenter.or.id/img/publication/ASEAN-Briefs-Vol5-Issue4-June-2018.pdf
Chalk, P. (1998). Contemporary Maritime Piracy in the Southeast Asia. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 21(1), 88â€“89.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd edition). Sage Publication.
Eadie, E. N. (2001). Definitions of piracy, particularly that of the International Maritime Bureau. Maritime Studies, 2001(119), 10â€“16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07266472.2001.10878641
Elleman, B. A., Forbes, A., & Rosenberg, D. (2010). Piracy and Maritime Crime: Historical and Modern Case Studies. Naval War College Press.
Espena, J. B. (8 September 2020). INDOMAPLHI: A Future for Southeast Asian Security?. Atlas Institute for International Affairs. https://www.internationalaffairshouse.org/indomalphi-a-future-for-southeast-asian-security/
International Chamber of Commerce. (2017). IMB report: Sea kidnappings rise in 2016 despite plummeting global piracy. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). https://iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/imb-report-sea-kidnappings-rise-2016-despite-plummeting-global-piracy/
Keohane, R. O. (1982). The Demand for International Regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 325â€“355.
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regime as Intervening Variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185â€“205.
Levy, M. A., Young, O. R., & ZÃ¼rn, M. (1995). The Study of International Regimes. European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 267â€“330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066195001003001
Miles, E. L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjaerseth, J.B., & Carlin, E.M. (2002). Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. The MIT Press.
Prasetyono, E. (2005). Keamanan Internasional dan Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia. In B. Bandoro (Ed), Mencari Desain Baru Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia (pp. 115-127). Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Puchala, D. J., & Hopkins, R. F. (1982). International Regimes: Lessons from inductive analysis. International Organization, 36(2), 245â€“275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018944
ReCAAP Information Sharing Centre. (2016). Annual Report: Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships in Asia. https://www.recaap.org/resources/ck/files/reports/annual/annualreport2017.pdf
Rosyidin, M. (29 November 2016). Logika Penelitian Hubungan Internasional [Conference presentation]. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, Bandung. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316165526_Logika_Penelitian_Hubungan_Internasional
Rustam, I. (2017). Kebijakan Keamanan Maritim di Perbatasan Indonesia: Kasus Kejahatan di Laut Sulawesi Ã¢â‚¬â€œLaut Sulu. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 14(2), 161â€“177.
Storey, I. (2018). Trilateral Security Cooperation in the Sulu-Celebes Seas: A Work in Progress. ISEAS Perspective, 48, 1â€“7. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2018_48@50.pdf
Twyman-Ghoshal, A. A. (2014). Contemporary piracy research in criminology: A review essay with directions for future research. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 38(3), 281â€“303. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2013.821079
Underdal, A. (1992). The concept of Regime Effectiveness. Cooperation and Conflict, 27(3), 227â€“240.
Underdal, A. (2002a). One Question, Two Answers. In E. L. Miles., A. Underdal., S. Andresen., J. Wettestad., J.B. Skjaerseth., & E.M. Carlin, Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence (pp. 3â€“45). MIT Press.
Underdal, A. (2002b). Methods of Analysis. In E. L. Miles., A. Underdal., S. Andresen., J. Wettestad., J.B. Skjaerseth., & E.M. Carlin, Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence (pp. 47â€“59). MIT Press.
Young, A.J. (2007). Contemporary Maritime Piracy in Southeast Asia: History, Causes and Remedies. ISEAS Publishing.