Cross – Border Identity and Cultural Hybridity among Border Communities in Jayapura – Vanimo Borderline

Trevor Graham Ongom; Etik Siswati  Ningrum; Tri  Handayani; Ratzinger Lodo

doi:10.31957/pjdir.v6i1.5122

Authors

Trevor Graham Ongom Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong (UNIMUDA)
Etik Siswati Ningrum Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong (UNIMUDA)
Tri Handayani Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong (UNIMUDA)
Ratzinger Lodo Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong (UNIMUDA)

Abstract

This study examines how cultural interaction along the Jayapura–Vanimo frontier shapes cross-border identity and produces cultural hybridity. Using a qualitative, literature-based design, the research integrates border process theory, hybridity theory and Melanesian relational perspectives to interpret how everyday practices contribute to identity formation in this borderland. The analysis finds that mobility, reciprocal exchange, ritual participation, and kinship obligations create a relational environment that operates independently of the political boundary, demonstrating that identity is sustained through ongoing social interaction rather than administrative categorization. The study also finds that hybridity forms an organized configuration comprising ritual reciprocity, institutional blending, and expressive practices that enable residents to navigate both customary and state systems. This research contributes by demonstrating that relational obligation functions as the key mechanism linking cross border interaction in the Melanesian context to the resilience of hybrid identity, clarifying why cultural ties endure even in the face of policy shifts or mobility constraints.

KEYWORDS

Border Bnteraction; Cultural Hybridity; Identity Formation; Jayapura–Vanimo; Relational obligation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amilhat-Szary, A.-L., & Giraut, F. (Eds.). (2015). Borderities: The politics of contemporary mobile borders. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468857

BNPP (Badan Nasional Pengelola Perbatasan). (2024, October 19). Pertukaran Informasi di Garis Depan ASEAN: Tantangan dan Peluang Pengelolan Perbatasan [Information Exchange at the ASEAN Frontline: Challenges and Opportunities in Border Management]. Sekretariat Badan Nasional Pengelola Perbatasan. https://bnpp.go.id/berita/pertukaran-informasi-di-garis-depan-asean-tantangan-dan-peluang-pengelolan-perbatasan

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.

Brambilla, C. (2023). Border temporalities and everyday border life. In T. M. Wilson (Ed.), Border studies: A multidisciplinary approach. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/usd/border-studies-9781800375383.html

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Consulate of the Republic of Indonesia, Vanimo. (2022). Performance report (LKj) on border management and citizen services. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Kemlu). https://kemlu.go.id/files/repositori/77884/172766778266fa1e461dd89_L1NoYXJlZCUyMERvY3VtZW50cy9MS0otMjAyMi5wZGY_.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359898621_The_SAGE_Handbook_of_Qualitative_Research_Design_Being_Creative_with_Resources_in_Qualitative_Research

Donnan, H., & Wilson, T. M. (1999). Borders: Frontiers of identity, nation and state. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Borders-Frontiers-of-Identity-Nation-and-State/Donnan-Wilson/p/book/9781859732465

Donnarumma, M. (2020). Across bodily and disciplinary borders: Hybridity as methodology, expression, and dynamic. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 238–248). ACM. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347246373_Across_Bodily_and_Disciplinary_Borders_Hybridity_as_methodology_expression_dynamic

Dwyer, P. D., & Minnegal, M. (2023). A road, a border, and development in New Guinea. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 24(4), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2023.2227612

Hau’ofa, E. (1994). Our Sea of Islands. The Contemporary Pacific, 6(1), 148–161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23701593

Hiraide, L. A. (2022). Ambivalent borders and hybrid culture: The role of culture and exclusion in historical European discourses of migration. Journal of European Studies, 52(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472441221090719

Ishikawa, N. (2010). Between frontiers: Nation and identity in a Southeast Asian borderland. NUS Press.

Konrad, V., & Szary, A.-L. (2023). Border culture: Theory, imagination, geopolitics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003301486

Korwa, J., & Rumabar, B. (2024, September 18). Challenges ahead for Indonesia–Papua New Guinea cross-border cooperation. The Devpolicy Blog, The Australian National University. https://devpolicy.org/challenges-ahead-for-indonesia-png-cross-border-cooperation-20240918/

Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press.

Lacy, R. B., & van Houtum, H. (2025). Borders have never been linear: Moving beyond the borderline map trap in political cartography. In T. M. Wilson (Ed.), Border studies: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 85–105). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan-Armstrong/publication/256294652_Naturalistic_Inquiry/links/02e7e5222605c57278000000/Naturalistic-Inquiry.pdf

McCracken, E. (2001). Hybridity and the space of the border in the writing of Norma Elia Cantú. Studies in 20th Century Literature, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1502

Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143–161. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx

Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113

Ohoiwutun, Y. (2023). Development of the Indonesia-Papua New Guinea interstate border. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(8), 2577–2585. https://www.iieta.org/journals/ijsdp/paper/10.18280/ijsdp.180830

Paasi, A. (2011). A “border theory”: An unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars? In D. Wastl-Walter (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to border studies (pp. 11–31). Ashgate Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272681482_Paasi_Anssi_2011_A_Border_theory_an_unattainable_dream_or_a_realistic_aim_for_border_scholars

Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies re-animated: Going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2303–2309. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282

Pakasi, U., Faridz, M., Majid, H., & Susilawati, S. (2024). Border governance through local community empowerment: Insights from the Indonesia–Papua New Guinea borderline. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(3), 693-711. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/Otoritas/article/view/15399

Pugu, M. R., & Amenes, A. A. (2025). Lokakarya Diplomasi Budaya Dan Kerjasama Perbatasan Dalam Kerangka Sister City Kota Jayapura-Vanimo-Wewak Papua New Guinea. Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia, 4(3), 504-514.

Pugu, M. R., & Sinaga, M. (2025). The Role of the Jayapura City Border Management Agency in the Jayapura City Sister City Program with Vanimo and Wewak Papua New Guinea. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics & Management, 5(1), 2968-2978.

Rachman, V. H. (2022). GEOPOLITICS: Dynamics and development of Indonesia’s maritime axis. Jurnal Ekonomi 11(03), 1102–1108. https://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi/article/view/843

Risal, S., Irawanto, P., Hergianasari, I., & Pramudiana, I. D. (2022). Border development model on the human development aspects for sustainable community. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 18(2), 125–138. https://jba.lan.go.id/article/download/971/369

Saehu, R., & Wulandari, I. (2024). Social cohesion in frontiers: Case study of Indonesia-Timor Leste cross-border society. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education Innovation and Social Science (ICEISS). https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/iceiss/article/view/5071

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10940958/

Sidaway, J. D. (2018). Decolonizing border studies? Geopolitics, 24(1), 270-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1491380?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle

Tambunan, E. M. B., & Lantang, F. (2022). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its implications for economic security in the Republic of Indonesia-Papua New Guinea border market area. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 10(2). https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jhi/article/download/12553/pdf/49840

Tambunan, E. M. B., & Lantang, F. (2024). The Pandemic Challenges for Traditional Communities at the Cross-Border Post Areas of the Republic of Indonesia-Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 20(1), 99-124

Tanati, D. (2019). The pattern settlement of adat delict of Waropen tribe. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 89, 14–20. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JLPG/article/view/49720

Tanati, D. (2024). Ownership patterns of land rights from the perspective of customary law communities in Waropen Regency Papua Province. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 4(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v4i3.361

Tendy, Yuniarti, Wirawan, R., & Sunandar, S. M. (2025). The Melanesian Way: Interpretation in the context of leadership and consensus as the approach to solving conflict. Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 5(1), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v5i1.4249

The National. (2024, July 19). Border-crossing MoUs signed. https://www.thenational.com.pg/border-crossing-mous-signed/

The PNG Sun. (2024, September 10). Border-crossing MoU bears fruit as trade and movement resume. https://www.thepngsun.com/border-crossing-mou-bears-fruit/

Voicu, C. (2011). Crossing borders of hybridity beyond marginality and identity. University of Bucharest Review, 13(1), 171–193. https://ubr.rev.unibuc.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/CristinaVoicu.pdf

Wastl-Walter, D. (Ed.). (2011). The Routledge research companion to border studies. Ashgate Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612782

Widmer, A. (2012). OF FIELD ENCOUNTERS AND METROPOLITAN DEBATES: Research and the making and meaning of the Melanesian'race'during demographic decline. Paideuma, 69-93.