Analisis Evaluasi Tata Kelola dan Kemanfaatan Program Kampung di Kampung Nayaro Distrik Mimika Baru Kabupaten Mimika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56076/jkesp.v10i3.5403Abstract
This research aims to identify leading sectors and changes in the economic structure without mining in Mimika This research aims: (1) to assess the governance of the village program implemented by the Nayaro Village POKJA (teamwork); and (2) to assess the benefits of the program that have been obtained by the community, especially the Kamoro tribe, so far. The approach used in this research is quantitative-descriptive, using a set of evaluation instruments to assess the governance and benefits of the Village Program, where the assessment is carried out using the Guttman Scale. The results of this research show that: (1) The governance of the village program implemented by the POKJA Nayaro Team is still considered poor because it is not transparent and accountable. This is mainly indicated by the failure to prepare Minutes of Agreement based on proposals from village deliberations, not publicizing the implementation of programs and activities to beneficiaries, not explaining the process and mechanism for complaints to beneficiaries, as well as the preparation of accountability reports that do not meet minimum standards; (2) Even though it is considered that the program management is still not good, in terms of the benefits of the program, the Kamoro community considers that the Village Program is very useful. However, please note that in the next stage, the focus should be more on efforts to empower the village economy and the economy of the Kamoro community.
Keywords : Program Governance, Program Benefits, Guttman Scale
Downloads
References
ACCESS. 2003. Kerangka Kerja Monitoring dan Evaluasi. Australian Community Development and Civil Society Strengthening Scheme, International Development Support Services PTY LTD, Jakarta.
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rinneka Cipta.
BAPPENAS. 2009. Pedoman Evaluasi Dan Indikator Kinerja Pembangunan. Deputi Evaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan, Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, Jakarta.
Bhattarai, R. N. 2020. Basic Concepts and Approaches of Results Based Management. Journal of Population and Development, June 2020 : pg. 156 - 171.
Bogdan, R., dan Taylor, S. 1992. Pengantar Metode Kualitatif. Penerbit Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.
BP2SDM. 2017. Pedoman Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Badan Pengembangan Dan Pemberdayaan SDM Kesehatan, Pusat Pendidikan SDM Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan RI, Jakarta.
Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Tradition. Sage Publications, London.
DSF. 2011. Kerangka Monitoring & Evaluasi (M&E) : Pengelolaan Batas Wilayah Negara & Kawasan Perbatasan. Decentralization Support Facility, Jakarta.
Elfindri. 2011. Beberapa Teknik Monitoring dan Evaluasi (MONEV). Jurnal Kesehatan Komunitas, Vol. 1, No. 3 : hlm. 106 - 128.
Farrell, G. M. 2009. Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation at the Commonwealth of Learning A Handbook. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver.
Görgens, M., and Kusek, J. Z. 2009. Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work A Capacity Development Toolkit. World Bank, Washington DC.
IOM Egypt. 2011. Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation. International Organization for Migration, Cairo.
JBA. 2007. Developing a Logic Model. James Bell Associates. Evaluation Brief, August 2007, Arlington.
Kusek, J. Z., and Rist, R. C. 2004. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System. World Bank, Washington DC.
Maulana, F. 2018. Modul Pelatihan Penyusunan Rencana Monitoring & Evaluasi : Program Landasan II 2016 – 2018. BaKTI, Makasar.
Pujiyono, B., dan Hanas, A. S. 2014. Manajemen Proyek. Universitas Terbuka, Jakarta.
Ronald, E.W. 1993. Pengantar Statistika. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Spreckley, F. 2009. Results Based Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit. Local Livelihoods Ltd, West Midlands.
Sugono, D., et al. 2008. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta.
Tjoetra, A., et al. 2008. Panduan Pelatihan Perencanaan, Monitoring Dan Evaluasi Program. Impact (Inspiration for Managing People’s Action), Banda Aceh.
Tool-4dev. 2017. Practical Tools For International Development : How to write an M&E framework. [www.tools4dev.org]
Triyono, B., et al. 2013. Reviu Program Pembangunan Nasional (RP2N). Kedeputian Evaluasi Kinerja Pembangunan Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/ BAPPENAS, Jakarta.
UNDP. 2009. Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluating for Results. United Nations Development Programme, New York.
Wrihatnolo, R. 2010. Model Logika Untuk Evaluasi Pembangunan. Institute for Development and Policy Study, Brighton.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
