Budaya Berbagi Ruang Kehidupan dan Kemajemukan Hukum Masyarakat Mamberamo Raya
Keywords:
Culture; Sharing; Space; Pluralism; Law; Mamberamo Raya; PapuaAbstract
This research aims to analyse the culture of sharing space and strategies in dealing with multicultural spatial arrangements in Mamberamo Raya Regency and to analyse the legal progress of the Mamberamo Raya community as an implication of the existence of sharing living space. This research uses a qualitative research method with an ethnographic approach. data collection techniques are interviews, observation, and documentation. Data analysis includes the stages of domain analysis, taxonomy analysis, componential analysis and cultural theme analysis. The results showed that the sharing of living space in local communities in Mamberamo Raya are: material meaningful space; historical meaningful space; religious meaningful space; educative meaningful space; economic meaningful space. The narrowing of the boundaries of living space in the conception of each ethnicity in Mamberamo Raya makes 'some' local ethnicities continue to try to be resistant with all the power they have. This occurs because of the desire to continue to maintain their respective cultures and the desire to continue to live together peacefully. The sharing of living space between local communities and migrants in Mamberamo Raya is largely determined by the legal institutions of each community that work together. As an alternative to solving the problem of inter-ethnic struggle for living space in Mamberamo Raya, it is necessary to have a deeper understanding of the function and role of law in people's lives.
Downloads
References
Afrizal. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bertrand, J. (2012). Nasionalisme dan Konflik Etnis di Indonesia (Terj. Ahmad). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Carr F. (2007). Mamberamo Madness. Inside Indonesia. Available at: www.insideindonesia.org/mamberamomadness diakses pada tanggal 14 Juli 2022
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Effendi, N. (2015). Kearifan Lokal Menuju Penguatan Karakter Sosial: Suatu Tantangan Dari Kemajemukan Budaya Di Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 16(2).
Elmslie, J. (2010). West Papuan Demographic Transition and the 2010 Indonesian Census: “Slow Motion Genocide” Or Not?. Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, 11(1).
Elmslie, J. & Webb-Gannon, C. (2014). A slow-motion genocide: Indonesian rule in West Papua, Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity 1(2).
Griffiths. J. (1986). What is legal pluralism, dalam Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. No. 24/2986.
Haviland, W.A. (1993). Antropologi Jilid 2. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Hooker, M.B. (1975). Legal Pluralism: Introduction to Colonial and Neo-colonial Law. London: Oxford University Press.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Kuegler, S. (2006). Jungle Child: Rinduku Pada Rimba Papua. Jakarta: Esensi Divisi dari Penerbit Erlangga.
Kusnadi. (2003). Akar Kemiskinan Nelayan. Yogyakarta: LKiS Pelangi Aksara.
Lewin, K. M. K. (1970). Instructional Design Theory and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status, Charles M. Regeluth (ed). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
LIPI. (2019). Policy Paper Strategi Peningkatan Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak untuk OAP di Papua Barat. Jakarta: Kedeputian IPSK-LIPI. Tim Prioritas Nasional Papua-LIPI.
Low & Zuniga. (2003). The Anthropology of Space and Place; Locating Culture. USA: Blacwell Publishing.
Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, M. A. R., & Wiranto, S. (2020). Propaganda issues of racism through social media to trigger social violence in Papua and West Papua in 2019. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity, 6(2), 212-224.
Santoso, S. (2009). Dinamika Kelompok (Cet. III). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sari, N., & Mariana, R. (2020). Hubungan antara dukungan sosial dengan optimisme pada perantau Minang survivor kerusuhan Wamena. Psyche 165 Journal, 183-189.
Seymour-Smith, C. (1987). Macmillan Dictionary of Anthropology. London and Basicstoke: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Spradley, J. P. (2007). Metode Etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Strelan, J G. & J. Golschalk. (1989). Kargoisme Di Melanesia. Jayapura: Pusat Studi Irianjaya.
Sunarto. (1985). Penduduk Indonesia dalam Dinamika Migrasi 1971-1980. Yogyakarta: Dua Dimensi.
Sundstrom, R. R., & Kim, D. H. (2014). Xenophobia and racism. Critical philosophy of race, 2(1), 20-45.
Tamanaha, B Z. (2001). Socio-Legal Positivism And A General Jurisprudence, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(1).
Tafira, K. (2011). Is xenophobia racism?. Anthropology Southern Africa, 34(3-4), 114-121.
Vallance R. J. (2012). A Melanesian Research Methodology’. in Joint AARE APERA International Conference, Sydney.
Wimmer, A. (1997). Explaining xenophobia and racism: A critical review of current research approaches. Ethnic and racial studies, 20(1), 17-41.
